![]() ![]() The Arihant design is based on Russian double hull design with a sealed nuclear reactor section. The news that the submarine was damaged because a hatch was left open is bogus but then expecting global times to do any research is idiotic. Accidents happen in all navies while operating complex systems like submarines in deep seas. This is rich from a country that lost a Ming class submarine with all hands in 2003 and whose clueless navy took almost 10 days to even find out it was even missing. In order to cover up the FACE LOSING SETBACK, and God knows the Indians are big on FACE since ’62, the Indian Navy spinned it as the work a dumb sailor.Ĭ’mon Man! How dumb do people think us human beings are anyway? Here’s what I think happened: a technical/mechanical glitch, i.e., Kursk, USS Scorpion, Chinese Xia class type accident, as in overheated reactor or something lessor, all of which are naturally occuring ups and downs of first tries at home grown submarines, happened to the Irahant. I mean unlocked hatch warning lights and/or safety features that prevents such WW2 mistakes from happening? C’mon Man!!! And, in the twenty first century,, it’s highly unlikely that the hatches in these Tiengong type space capsules can be left unlocked. On another note, on this "EXCUSE of UNLOCKED HATCH mishap however, how dumb does some people think we homo-sapients are anyway? I mean this is the twenty first century. It is other countries, who, out of ENVY, HATE, or RACIAL INTENSIONS, who have this tendency of MOCKING CHINA. Look, we Chinese, or Global, have no need to MOCK India or any ither country. □ Babble Fish isn’t really that perfect of a program you know. A case of lost in translation, shall we say? Global Times might miss-quote on its reportings just like NYT, WP, even CNN, i.e., as in accusing China of stealing :). “Improvement in military technology does not come about overnight and is not solely a military issue, but is related to a country’s comprehensive strength, level of technology, manufacturing capability and quality of personnel,” it said, adding a “warm reminder” that New Delhi would be better to divert resources from the arms race and rivalry with Beijing to proper, basic training of its troops. ![]() However, the sailors on the vessel failed to take good care of it,” a Beijing-based naval expert told the newspaper.Ĭriticising the caliber of India’s armed forces, the report said the Arihant gaffe had shown that most of its soldiers were “not well-educated and lack the necessary knowledge to operate advanced weaponry”. ![]() “As a national strategic weapon, the nuclear submarine requires careful maintenance, strict management and operation. The state-owned Global Times mocked the “indiscipline and slackness” of the submarine’s commanders and crew and said the Indian Navy may be “too amateurish” to operate such a complex, advanced vessel. A diagram illustrating the internal structure of the Arihant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |